Search Judgments

Clear

Showing 76–100 of 195 results

Case Name Date Court Jurisdiction Judge Type
Andre Kirk Everett Hypolite v The Queen
[2010] CA (Bda) 14 Crim 		2010-11-23 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
Goodwin Davano Spencer v The Queen
[2010] CA (Bda) 12 Crim 		2010-11-16 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca
Ze Menefeskiduse Selassie v The Queen
[2011] CA (Bda) 10 Crim 		2010-11-15 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
The Queen v Melvin Martin
[2010] CA (Bda) 10 Crim 		2010-06-16 Court of Appeal Criminal Reasons For Decision
The Queen v Melvin Martin
[2010] CA (Bda) 10 Crim 		2010-06-16 Court of Appeal Criminal Reasons For Decision
Luke David Armstrong v The Queen
[2010] CA (Bda) 6 Crim 		2010-03-18 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca
Antoine Herbert Anderson v Philip Anthony Bradshaw The Queen
[2010] CA (Bda) 1 Crim 		2010-03-02 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca
The Queen v DARRONTE LAVAR DILL The DPP, Mr. Mahoney and Ms. Sofianos for the Crown;
[2010] SC (Bda) 4 Crim (19 January 2010) 		2010-01-19 Supreme Court Criminal
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 23 of 2007 SIDNEY O'NEIL GIBBONS v CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 24 of 2007 RONALD O'NEAL BEACH THE QUEEN
[2009] CA (Bda) 10 Crim 		2009-06-19 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
Andrina Tamara Smith v The Queen
[2009] CA (Bda) 9 Crim 		2009-06-01 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Decision
EUNICE LAMBERT (Police Constable) v Richard Cox
[2009] CA (Bda) 7 Crim 		2009-03-20 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
Barry Eugene Rahman v The Queen
[2009] CA (Bda) 4 Crim 		2009-03-19 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
The Queen v Stephen Gladstone Thompson
[2008] SC (Bda) 63 Crim (15 December 2008) 		2008-12-15 Supreme Court Criminal Ex Tempore Ruling
Dennis Alma Robinson v The Queen
[2009] CA (Bda) 8 Crim 		2008-11-28 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca
Owen Anthony Reid v The Queen 2008-11-14 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca
Dillas v The Queen 2008-11-14 Court of Appeal Criminal
The Queen v Goodwin Davano Spencer
[2008] SC (Bda) 49 Crim (26 September 2008) 		2008-09-26 Supreme Court Criminal Ruling
The Queen v RASHAD COOPER Dates of Trial: 2 July 2008 - 4 July 2008
[2008] SC (Bda) 44 Crim (4 July 2008) 		2008-07-04 Supreme Court Criminal Ex Tempore Ruling
Tewolde Mathin Selassie v The Queen 2008-06-18 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Judgment
KENNETH JERMAINE BURGESS First Appellant DENNIS ALMA ROBINSON v THE QUEEN Second Appellant
[2008] CA (Bda) 3 Crim 		2008-03-19 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
Harron Lee Evans v The Queen
[2008] CA (Bda) 2 Crim 		2008-03-19 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca
Terrence St. Patrick Smith v The Queen 2007-11-29 Court of Appeal Criminal Nazareth Reasons For Judgment
Michael Amershak Jones v The Queen
[2007] CA (Bda) 12 Crim 		2007-11-29 Court of Appeal Criminal Nazareth Judgment
Maatkari Tamerry & Amenemhet Tamerry v The Queen
[2007] CA (Bda) 8 Crim 		2007-06-26 Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 13 & 14 of 2024 AMIR MIZRACHY v The King
[2024] CA (Bda) 24 Civ (with which Sir Anthony Smellie CJ and Sir Christopher Clarke P concurred) to illustrate the practical approach to deciding whether the grounds of appeal relied upon raise questions of great "general or public importance". I observed: 		Court of Appeal Criminal Kawaley
The King v Maria Dos Anjos Bento Supreme Court Criminal Juan Sentence
Re R V Christian Sousa Matias Court of Appeal Criminal Subair Williams Sentence
His Majesty The King v A H AW Adley Duncan, Office of the Director for Public Prosecutions, instructed by Miss Cindy Clarke, Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Appellant. Jerome Lynch KC, Trott & Duncan Ltd., for the Respondents Hearing date: 13 June 2023
[2023] CA (Bda) 29 Crm 		Court of Appeal Criminal Clarke
The Queen v Charles Johnson Supreme Court Criminal Subair Williams Ruling
Leveck Roberts v Her Majesty The Queen Quincy Brangman Her Majesty The Queen Khyri Smith-Williams Her Majesty The Queen
[2021] CA (Bda) Crim 		Court of Appeal Criminal Clarke Approved Judgment
Omar Davy v THE QUEEN Ms Elizabeth Christopher of the Legal Aid Office for the Applicant
[2021] CA (Bda) 5 Crim 		Court of Appeal Criminal Clarke Approved Judgment
Travone Saltus v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Baker
The Court of Appeal for Bermuda CRIMINAL APPEAL No 17 of 2014 TYMOTHY SCRADERS v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Decision
The Court of Appeal for Bermuda CRIMINAL APPEAL No 7 of 2014 NATALIE SIMPSON v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Decision
Dameko Dublin v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
The Court of Appeal for Bermuda CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2 of 2014 JONATHAN JON CUMBERBATCH v THE QUEEN REASONS FOR DECISION Baker, J.A. 1. On 29 May 2014, we allowed Jonathan Cumberbatch's appeal against conviction on Count 1 for serious sexual assault and substituted a conviction for the lesser offence of sexual assault. We refused an extension of time for leave to appeal against sentence. Facts 2. On 3 May 2010, Cumberbatch was convicted on his own confession of four offences, one of serious sexual assault contrary to section 325(1)(d) of the Criminal Code and the other three of sexual exploitation contrary to section 182B(1) of the Criminal Code. On 16 July 2010 he was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment being made up of 12 years for the serious sexual assault and 10 years concurrent for the other three offences. Simmons J made an order under section 70P of the Criminal Code that he should serve at least half of the sentence before consideration for parole. The Crown appealed against sentence and this was dismissed by a different Division of the Court on 9 June 2011 who affirmed the sentence. 3. The one issue that caused the Court to allow the appeal against conviction to go forward long out of time was whether the facts put forward by the Crown on count 1 amounted to serious sexual assault within the meaning of section 325(1)(d). If, as we concluded, they did not, the conviction on that count had to be set aside. Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Decision
Tracey Pitt v THE QUEEN Respondent/Appellant TRACEY PITT Baker, JA: 1. Tracey Pitt was tried in the Supreme Court before Wolffe AJ and a jury on an indictment containing six counts. On 10 September 2013 she was acquitted of counts 1 and 3, causing grievous bodily harm when driving a vehicle whilst impaired by alcohol and count 5 driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. She was convicted of counts 2 and 4, reckless driving contrary to section 320 of the Criminal Code and count 6, failing or refusing to provide a specimen of breath contrary to section 35C(7) of the Road Traffic Act 1947. She was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment concurrent on each count and on count 6 was also disqualified for 18 months with 8 demerit points. 2. On 19 March 2014 we allowed her appeal against conviction on counts 2 and 4 and dismissed her appeal against conviction on count 6. We allowed her appeal against sentence on count 6 to the extent of varying her sentence by vacating the 3 month sentence of imprisonment and reducing the disqualification from 18 to 12 months. We now give our reasons. Facts 3. On Sunday, 29 January 2012, about 2:30 a.m, the appellant was driving a Toyota Corolla south along Woodlands Road in Pembroke Parish. Just after she passed Canal Road on her left she collided with 36 year old twin brothers, Rudolph Smith and Randolph Smith who were on the tarmac wrestling in the south bound lane. They both received serious injuries. Rudolph sustained a fractured skull, lung contusions and his mental state was affected. Randolph had a fractured left ankle, a fractured dislocation of his left tibia and fibula, multiple lumber and pelvic fractures plus injuries to the face and head. No other vehicle was involved. 4. The appellant called 911. When the police arrived she showed signs of having consumed alcohol and was arrested. On being cautioned for driving whilst impaired she said "I'm sorry. I was driving my vehicle and I felt like I hit something." There was no evidence that she was driving at excessive speed. Police reconstruction concluded that the brothers had been dragged some 13.26 meters from impact. There were no brake marks but a witness said the appellant's brake lights came on followed by a short screech and impact. 5. She was taken to Hamilton Police Station and indeed admitted to having consumed two glasses of red wine. She was asked to provide a specimen of breath and at first agreed. But after she had been given the opportunity of speaking to a lawyer on the telephone and having been unable to contact one she refused on the ground that she had not spoken to one. Reckless Driving Court of Appeal Criminal Reasons For Decision
The Court of Appeal for Bermuda CRIMINAL APPEAL No 5 of 2013 THE QUEEN v Jennifer Franks Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Decision
The Court of Appeal for Bermuda CRIMINAL APPEAL No 10 of 2012 JANIS ZEGELIS v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Judgment
Antoine Anderson v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Decision
Ki-Roy Kinta Butterfield Jahcai Daniel Morris Tahir Nesta Bascome v The Queen
[2007] CA (Bda) 3 Crim 		Court of Appeal Criminal Zacca Reasons For Judgment
Joeshun Russell v The Queen Court of Appeal Criminal Baker Ex Tempore Judgment
George Darrin Virgil v The Queen
[2016] CA (Bda) Crim (18 March 2016) 		Court of Appeal Criminal Baker
The Queen v REBECCA WALLINGTON Mr Alan Richards (Office of the Director for Public Prosecutions) for the Appellant Mr Mark Pettingill (Chancery Legal Ltd) for the Respondent Hearing date: 1 March 2022
[2022] CA (Bda) Crim 3 		Court of Appeal Criminal Clarke Judgment
Josef Vlcek v THE QUEEN Ms Aura-Lee Cassidy (Kairos Philanthropy) for the Applicant Ms Cindy Clarke (Director for Public Prosecutions) for the Respondent Hearing date: 3 March 2022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[2022] CA (Bda) Crim 5 		Court of Appeal Criminal Clarke Judgment